Follow @theurbancountry on Twitter Find us on Facebook Subscribe to via e-mail Subscribe to via RSS
Follow @theurbancountry on Twitter Find us on Facebook Subscribe to via e-mail Subscribe to via RSS

The Chinese’ Ridiculous Aversion To Seatbelts 2

Chinese seatbelt t-shirt

China’s “seatbelt t-shirt” – Photo courtesy of hljnews / carnewschina

Despite China’s national seatbelt legislation coming into effect in 2004, seatbelts are still not widely used in China almost 10 years later. In fact, virtually nobody in China wears a seatbelt while travelling in the rear seat of an automobile.

This, despite the fact that somewhere between 68,000 and 220,000 people are killed on the roads in China each year.

An Australian study observed seatbelt use in 20,939 vehicles in Nanjing from 2005-2007 and found that 49.9% of drivers wore seatbelts, while only 9.1% of front passengers wore them, and a scant 0.5% of rear passengers wore seatbelts.

Further, the Chinese go to absurd lengths to avoid wearing seatbelts. Many cars I saw while living in China had gadgets that slip into the front seat belt socket to prevent sounding the seatbelt warnings that come standard in most modern cars.

China safety belt

Seat belt aversion gadget photo courtesy of Shanghaiist 

I have seen taxi drivers slip the seatbelt around their neck to make it look like they are wearing it (which would be neither comfortable nor safe).

But perhaps topping the list of absurd seatbelt aversion tactics is the “seatbelt t-shirt” (pictured at the top of this article). The shirt makes the driver appear to be wearing a seatbelt in order to avoid receiving fines from police.

On the back of these t-shirts, they should write “I might be brain dead and paralysed for life, but at least I averted that 50 Yuan fine”.

Chinese seatbelt t-shirt

China’s “seatbelt t-shirt” – Photo courtesy of hljnews / carnewschina 

In 2007 I was the passenger in the back seat of a Volkswagen Golf taxi which, like most taxis in China, had no seatbelts in the rear seat. We were on a 4 hour driver at night time, and the driver appeared to be falling asleep behind the wheel.

The prospect of a head-on collision wasn’t very appealing to me with or without a seatbelt, but the lack of seatbelt certainly contributed to my anxiety.

Everyone else in the car was sleeping at the time (including the driver it seemed), so I made him pull over to a store to drink some Coca-Cola to help him stay awake and keep us alive, as we didn’t have a lot of other options while driving at night across the Chinese countryside.

Shanghaiist covered the issue of seatbelt aversion in China in a recent article with a lovely write-up by James Griffiths:

“As any seven year old knows, seatbelts are for dorks. Getting your face mangled in a crash, or slamming into the back of the person in front of you and giving them internal injuries, is just cooler. But what about that irritating beeping in modern vehicles designed to force you to wear a seatbelt? China has the answer.

Belt heads without the nasty, life-saving belt. Available on Taobao for under 10 yuan, these stylish clips get rid of the annoying beep without the unwanted side effect of preventing you from being flung through your windscreen.”

Well put Mr. Griffiths.

James D. Schwartz is the Editor of The Urban Country and is based in Toronto, Canada. You can contact James at or follow him on Twitter.

i share the road

More Articles Like This:

2 thoughts on “The Chinese’ Ridiculous Aversion To Seatbelts

  1. Mar 19,2013 3:52 am

    I went to China for a summer in ’93, and what’s changed hasn’t changed for the better. Got a chest infection that lasted months. Lost twenty pounds due to… what? Now there’s air-pollution that would outdo Dicken’s London, and poverty, corruption and treatment of children that would do the same. You’re not convincing me to change my determination never to set foot in the place again! Sure, I know ‘the West’ was as ugly in its industrialization, but I don’t have to go there (then) either.

  2. Richard Johns Mar 19,2013 2:54 pm

    According to the UK geographer John Adams, widespread wearing of seatbelts hasn’t saved nearly the number of lives anticipated. While highly effective in the event of a crash, they apparently increase the chance of a crash to begin with (‘risk compensation’). Also, the general use of seatbelts has apparently caused the deaths of more pedestrians and cyclists.

    Even mainstream authors (e.g. Allport et. al. in *Significance*, June 2008) put the annual number of car occupants’ lives saved in the UK at 352, rather than the 2000 or so predicted. And this has come at the expense of about 190 additional deaths of people outside cars.

    Perhaps the Chinese motorists are actually doing cyclists and pedestrians a favour?

Leave a Reply