Police Radar – Trois-Rivieres – Photo Courtesy of Axel Drainville
In a recent media flurry, “scofflaw cyclists” were repudiated by several outlets after prominent Canadian environmental activist David Suzuki railed against bicyclists who break the rules.
What these media articles fail to mention is that virtually all drivers break the law every single day.
Photo Radar: “Cash grab” from poor scofflaw drivers
Just ask any driver here in Ontario if they support photo radar on our roads to enforce speed limits. They will most likely scoff at the mere suggestion of photo radar and call it a “cash grab”.
Indeed, a cash grab that targets scofflaw drivers. If drivers obeyed our laws, there wouldn’t be much cash to grab. Problem solved, right?
Ontario dabbled with photo radar in 1994 under Premier of Bob Rae. The program cost $4.5 million to implement and brought in $19 million in revenue. Studies showed it reduced speeding on highways to improve safety.
But that wasn’t enough to keep it alive. The program was scrapped after just 11 months under the new Premier Mike Harris, whose election promise including scrapping the program under the premise that it was nothing more than a “cash grab”.
Motor vehicles kill hundreds of thousands of people
How can drivers wag their fingers at bicyclists and still keep a straight face? It is, after all, motor vehicles that kill hundreds of thousands of people every year.
Car crashes kill the equivalent of a September 11th terrorist attack happening every 9.1 days in the 29 OECD countries that were included in a 2005 study by Injury Prevention.
In 2001 alone, there were 119,641 road crash deaths in the 29 OECD countries included in the survey. More than 33,000 people were killed on US roads last year.
In the first 7 months of 2011, the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) had handed out nearly 10,000 tickets for distracted driving. In 2010 there were more than 7,000 collisions on OPP-patrolled roads due to distracted driving, resulting in 35 deaths and over 1,000 injuries.
Ignoring this reality and trying to shift attention to bicyclists who are expected to follow laws that were designed for motor vehicles does nothing to improve safety on our streets.
Enforcing our speed limits could save hundreds of lives every year. Should a driver’s entitlement to drive above the maximum speed limit take precedence over possibly saving hundreds or thousands of peoples’ lives?
“’Scofflaw driver kills four’ sounds odd”
On the other hand, perhaps the label “scofflaw cyclist” is a backhanded compliment, as suggested by our friend @situpvancouver on Twitter:
Tomorrow we will take this discussion in a healthier direction and discuss how proper bicycle infrastructure can create incentives for bicyclists to obey the law and help us overcome the “scofflaw cyclist” label. Stay tuned.
James D. Schwartz is the Editor of The Urban Country and is based in Toronto, Canada. You can contact James at email@example.com or follow him on Twitter.
More Articles Like This:
- Grandmother Writes Apology Letter After Driving Like “Idiot” (June 2013)
- Responsibility & Accountability On Our Streets (Apr 2011)
- No Cars. No Traffic Signals. No Deaths (June 2011)
- Baby On Board: A Desperate Plea (Feb 2012)
- Our Backwards Approach to Road Safety (July 2011)
- The World Has Changed. So Can You. (April 2011)
Just listen to 30-seconds of CFRB the next time transportation comes up.
If the end result is a motorists paying more (or paying anything), cash grab is instantly brought up. Run a red light or stop sign? Speed? Parked illegally? Receive a ticket for any of those things? Cash grab.
What I found funny about Timson’s recent article, is when she just tells Stintz to pay the fine and not fight it.
I don’t recall the last time I heard any Toronto media tell motorists to just “pay the fine”. Instead they openly encourage people to fight all sorts of tickets.
Hopefully the next article I read from David Suzuki looks like this:
–David Suzuki joins chorus of activists railing against scofflaw motorists seen to be ruining it for everyone else–
The “ruining it for everyone else” bit is also getting old. Funny how it only applies to cycling.
Like most cities, capital of The Netherlands is overcrowded
and housing may be a major downside. within the recent decades, the town engineered
trendy lodging homes with multiple units where empty house was found. it’s
currently attainable to examine immense lodging buildings among centuries
previous homes and this bothers several capital of The Netherlands dwellers UN
agency square measure certain to tradition.
what is scofflaw driver means..?
Agen xamthone plus denpasar